Welcome to the Oklahoma House of Representatives

OKLAHOMA CITY – Rep. Danny Williams, R-Seminole, hosted interim study IS25-115 , Life Without Parole Sentencing Review, which examined Oklahoma’s use of life without parole (LWOP) sentences, including an exploration of second look policies and their economic impact. The study discussed the growing number of states adopting second look policies, which allow courts to review life or long-term sentences after evidence of rehabilitation. "My goal for this study was to ask if our current sentencing practices are fair and if not, what a change should look like," Williams said. "There are other states that have implemented second look laws, and Oklahoma could benefit from a similar pathway." Colleen McCarty, executive director of the Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law, presented data showing the Oklahoma Department of Corrections’ daily cost per inmate is $67.53, totaling $24,648 annually and nearly $493,000 over 20 years, excluding geriatric healthcare costs. She noted that several states , including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah and Washington, as well as the Council of the District of Columbia, have adopted second look policies. McCarty added that Oklahoma’s recently enacted Survivors’ Act reflects similar principles and could serve as a model for future reform. Under potential proposals, adults serving LWOP sentences could become eligible for review after 20 years if they meet rehabilitation benchmarks, including educational achievements, program completions and positive conduct. Victims and survivors would be notified and given an opportunity to provide input during the process. For individuals sentenced before age 25, a review could occur after 15 years, with courts considering factors such as youth trauma, maturity and rehabilitation. Denied petitions could be refiled every five years. McCarty estimated that if just 10 people qualified per year, Oklahoma could save roughly $246,000 annually. The study also included testimony from community members and family members of incarcerated Oklahomans who have been affected by sentencing laws. "As a Christian, I believe in redemption and forgiveness for everyone, but people must show they’ve done the work to heal and change," Williams said. "They should be given the chance to prove it." The study took place on Oct. 21 before the House Public Safety Committee at the Oklahoma State Capitol.

OKLAHOMA CITY – Lawmakers, veterans, those representing seniors and the aging, tax experts and others gathered Tuesday before the House Appropriations & Budget Finance Subcommittee to discuss property tax reform. The combined interim study was requested by Reps. Denise Crosswhite Hader, R-Piedmont, and Tammy Townley, R-Ardmore. "Many of us have heard lots of concern about people being priced out of their homes due to rising property taxes," Crosswhite Hader said. "There are some functions government has to fund, but we wanted to bring people together to discuss current law and where we might improve, especially for our veterans and senior citizens." Townley added, "We know this is a big topic and very in-depth. We're so grateful for everyone who joined us for this study. We know that if we do reduce ad valorem in any way in one area, we have to determine how to replace that money to continue vital services for all Oklahomans. At the end of the day, we just want to do better for all Oklahomans." Study attendees first heard from retired U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Stanley Sieg, a 100% disabled veteran. He shared his personal experience with receiving and then losing the veterans' property tax exemption when he moved mid-year within the City of Edmond. He said he was unaware his exemption would not automatically follow him. He was able to work with his county tax assessor to reapply for the exemption and reconcile the amount of back taxes for which he was billed. He asked lawmakers to consider changes in the law to make the exemptions portable or to at least improve communication with Oklahoma taxpayers. Matt Wehmuller, the county assessor for Canadian County, explained that property tax is the largest source of local funding, with 85% going to public education, and 15% going to counties for public safety and other local services, including administration. Property taxes, however, are not used for county roads and bridges. Dr. Brad Ward, deputy state director of Americans for Prosperity, showed data exposing the rising burdens of property tax within Oklahoma as opposed to the surrounding region. Ward said while Oklahoma's current property tax rate is competitive with surrounding states, coming in third, the state's rising rate is actually the fastest growing in the region. That is alarming, he said. He suggested some of this might be due to efforts the state made to standardize property valuations among the state's 77 counties, causing a spike for those that had been under valuation for years. Another factor is school bond elections – 43 passed in 2023 and 15 of 19 passed a month ago. Another presenter, Kerry Ross, the county assessor for Carter County, said litigation cases against cities and counties also can play a role in rising property tax rates. Doug Kellogg, state projects director with Americans for Tax Reform, said rising home values are significant as well. Jim Randall, chairman of the Oklahoma State Council on Aging, asked if it's time to bring all parties together to take a comprehensive look at the state's tax structure to see what is equitable for everyone. He said property owners, specifically seniors and others on a fixed income, should be protected from rising costs, while acknowledging local services do need to be funded. Wehmuller explained how property taxes and exemptions are calculated, discussing how annually capping tax increases at 3% and 5%, depending on the type of property owned, until full-market value is reached, protects property owners even more than the standard $1,000 homestead exemption. He also explained the difference between exemptions and freezes and how those who have had their property taxes frozen can still be impacted by large bond elections or litigation. Kellogg shared Florida's zero-income tax structure and a ballot question to remove property tax. He said Florida is known as one of the most tax friendly states in the nation, getting most of its funding through sales and excise taxes. They've also adopted a truth in taxation, or truth in millage, policy that requires public hearings and input before new taxes are assessed. Telling taxpayers clearly when their taxes are going up and where the money will go is essential, he said. State spending is another key, Kellogg said. If local governments had kept spending in line with population growth and inflation, they would be in much better shape today. He ended with a warning against giving local governments a tax revenue source that local voters did not approve. Corey Jager, tax policy manager with the Oklahoma Tax Commission, rounded out the day's discussion with an overview of property tax exemptions, freezes and credits and estimated revenue impacts for changes for seniors or veterans. Much of property tax law is enshrined in the state's Constitution and therefore would require a vote of the people to change. Yager also discussed the loss of revenue that would occur if property tax were eliminated and gave some alternative funding suggestions, including the possibility of taxing services not currently taxed. The full study can be viewed here . 

OKLAHOMA CITY – Rep. Ronny Johns, R-Ada, and Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, hosted a joint interim study Monday to explore potential incentive pay models for Oklahoma teachers. The study focused on how voluntary, performance-based compensation systems could improve teacher recruitment, retention and student outcomes. The study featured a presentation from Secretary of Education Dan Hamlin, who provided a detailed analysis of State Department of Education (SDE) data and comparisons to states that have implemented similar programs. Hamlin highlighted evidence showing that high-quality teachers have the single greatest impact on student success, accounting for as much as 80% of academic progress in a school year. "Secretary Hamlin did an outstanding job presenting the data and showing how programs like these have worked in other states," Johns said. "We’re seeing that Oklahoma could implement an incentive pay model through the State Department of Education without adding new burdens on schools or superintendents. This kind of structure would allow teachers to work together toward shared goals rather than competing against each other, while creating its own revenue stream alongside the current Teacher Empowerment Program." The study reviewed models from states such as Texas and Arkansas, where thousands of teachers have received performance-based bonuses ranging from $3,000 to $32,000 annually. These programs reward teachers for measurable student growth and classroom effectiveness, often using growth-based metrics to determine eligibility. Oklahoma’s current system, adopted in 2022 through the Oklahoma Teacher Empowerment Program (OTEP), rewards teachers who take on leadership roles and mentor peers. For the 2024-2025 school year, 89 districts participated, with more than 1,100 teachers benefiting from an average bonus of $7,750. Pugh said interest in expanding performance-based pay has grown among educators statewide. "I heard from teachers in 67 different school districts who wanted to know why their schools weren’t participating in the Empowerment Program," Pugh said. "There’s a real appetite for rewarding excellence in the classroom. I’m not afraid to pay our best and brightest teachers more than what the salary schedule calls for. What we need to work on is creating the structure that helps districts identify those teachers and gives them the flexibility to reward them for their impact." Hamlin suggested the state consider adding an incentive pay program tied to performance or value-based metrics. Under a proposed Growth-Based Teacher Compensation System for Oklahoma, teachers would be eligible for bonuses based on measurable student progress. The model would track student achievement over time, taking into account prior academic performance, demographic factors and other indicators to calculate expected growth. Teachers whose students exceed those expectations would qualify for bonus pay. As an example, Hamlin outlined a $25 million pilot program for grades 4 through 8. Teachers whose students demonstrated the highest levels of growth could earn between $5,000 and $25,000 in additional compensation. Teachers in the 67th–79th percentile could receive $5,000, with approximately 1,875 teachers recognized statewide. Teachers in the 80th–94th percentile could receive $15,000, with about 781 teachers recognized. Teachers in the 95th percentile and above could receive $25,000, with roughly 156 teachers recognized. The total estimated cost of the pilot program would be $25 million. The legislators said they plan to continue working with education leaders and stakeholders to in the Second Regular Session of the 60th Legislature to evaluate how an opt-in incentive pay model could complement existing programs while recognizing and rewarding Oklahoma’s most effective teachers.