Representative Tom Gann

R

District 8

Hi, I'm Tom Gann and I represent the people of Oklahoma's 8th District.


representative

News & Announcements

Nov 10, 2025
Recent Posts

Legality of $1B+ PSO Bond Payments, Rate Increases Now in Hands of OK Supreme Court

OKLAHOMA CITY – In a brief filed Monday, State Rep. Tom Gann, R-Inola, reiterated his challenge to $250 million in recent rate increases and more than $1 billion of bond payments approved by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) and currently being collected from customers of electric utility Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO). PSO primarily serves customers in Tulsa, McAlester, Lawton and surrounding areas. Gann’s appeal before the Oklahoma Supreme Court argues that the OCC failed to perform legally required audits related to February 2021’s Winter Storm “Uri,” making the OCC’s orders void and requiring refunds. He also argues the OCC violated PSO customers’ due process rights by allowing Corporation Commissioner Todd Hiett to participate in cases involving witnesses of Hiett’s alleged criminal conduct. Hiett has been publicly accused of alleged sexual harassment and drunk driving at a 2023 party hosted by PSO attorneys Thompson Tillotson PLLC. Gann says state ethics rules require Hiett to disqualify from cases in which a reasonable person might question his impartiality, including cases involving those attorneys. In October, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, the OCC, PSO and the Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers (OIEC) all filed briefs defending Hiett. “Parties to legislative rate cases are not entitled to due process,” the attorney general wrote.  In its brief, the OCC specifically asked the court to dismiss the appeal claims against Hiett. Gann has been joined by State Reps. Kevin West and Rick West in five similar appeals brought in cases for OG&E and ONG. On Oct. 17, the attorney general and OCC filed a joint motion asking the court to suspend the other the utility appeals. The court’s Oct. 29 response denying that request was unequivocal: “This appeal shall proceed.”  The AG, OCC and PSO also defended allowing the utility to internally audit its own $700 million of 2021 Winter Storm “Uri” costs, as well as the OCC’s subsequent one-page “audits” of the ratepayer-backed bonds issued to pay for them. Gann argues none of these audits were lawful because they were not performed by independent CPAs.  In their briefs, the AG, OCC and PSO all argued the audits were lawful because licensed CPAs were not required. Gann writes their reading of the law “would permit OCC janitors and AG security guards to give financial testimony in OCC cases.”   “To allow State Agencies to make up their own standardless definition of ‘audit’ is absurd,” Gann writes. He predicts that this misinterpretation of the law will lead to “financial chaos across state government if it is allowed to stand.” Oklahoma utilities PSO, OG&E, ONG and CenterPoint/Summit paid some of the highest natural gas prices in U.S. history during two weeks in February 2021, incurring some $2.8 billion in debt. Interest and other expenses added another $2 billion, bringing the total cost of the winter storm bonds being paid by Oklahoma utility customers close to $5 billion.   Payments for PSO’s bonds have been collected as “Winter Storm Cost Recovery Rider” charges on the monthly bills of its customers since the bonds were issued in September 2022. They are scheduled to continue for another 17 years. The securitization law required those bond charges to be audited as part of the utilities’ subsequent rate cases. Gann says that hasn’t happened. Unless it decides to request additional briefs from the parties, Gann’s appeal is now in the hands of the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Gann writes that he “has full confidence in this court’s ability to read and offer first-impression interpretations of the plain language of unambiguous laws, and to properly determine their applicability to the OCC.” Gann’s full Reply Brief can be read online here: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetDocument.aspx?ct=appellate&bc=1063629140&cn=CU-122861&fmt=pdf See also: Feb. 14, 2025: https://www.okhouse.gov/posts/News-20250214_1 August 21, 2025: https://www.okhouse.gov/posts/news-20250821_1 The progress of all the appeals can be followed on the Oklahoma Supreme Court website: PSO rate case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122861 ONG, PSO & OG&E CY2023 fuel cases: (I'm showing this one does not list PSO) https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122991 OG&E rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123021 ONG rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123348

Oct 28, 2025
Recent Posts

Property Owners Can Reclaim Seized Land After Nov. 1

After Nov. 1, the Oklahoma Transportation Commission will be required to notify previous property owners if the land they sold to the Commission is going to be offered for sale. The property owners would then have the right to repurchase at their original selling price. The change comes thanks to House Bill 1103 , passed this year by Rep. Tom Gann, R-Inola. The measure was requested by Myron Grabowski who lives in Gann's House district. "Mr. Grabowski witnessed the taking of another person's land by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation and then found out it was later sold without any notification to the property owner," Gann said. "This new law at least will give people in similar circumstances the ability to repurchase land that was taken from them by eminent domain." For his part, Grabowski said, “I just want what's right for the people of Oklahoma.” Sen. Ally Seifried, R-Claremore is the Senate author of the bill. “If land acquired by the Department of Transportation is later sold, the original owner deserves the first opportunity to buy it back at a fair price,” Seifried said. “This change in law is simply the right thing to do for Oklahoma property owners. I’m proud to see this bill become law after two years of work and grateful to have partnered with Representatives Gann and Lepak on this issue. Although a previous version of the bill passed the Senate, it didn’t receive a hearing in the House, so I’m glad to see this finally come to fruition.”  Gann explained this measure extends the window of time that previous landowners have to reclaim their land – from 30 to 90 days - and specifies notification requirements by the Commission. The measure also removes the five-year time period the Commission now has to notify previous owners of the sale of the property. Rep. Mark Lepak, R-Claremore, is a coauthor of the bill and the author of previous identical legislation.  "By removing the five-year requirement, we're disincentivizing the Commission from holding onto property so they can sell it at an increased price," Lepak said. "This will hopefully encourage the Commission to more quickly offer property back to the original owner, giving them the opportunity to reclaim their land."  Gann said the changes "add transparency to the process by requiring online publication of the land sale. This also clarifies eligibility and ensures fair offers to the original landowner rather than allowing the Department of Transportation to profit off of land they've taken." The notice is to contain an offer to sell the property back to the previous owner at no greater than the original price, provided the previous owner did not use federal funds to purchase the property. Notices must be sent by registered mail and posted on the Department of Transportation's website. The act becomes effective Nov. 1. 

Oct 16, 2025
Recent Posts

Gann Studies License Plate Readers Impact on Privacy

OKLAHOMA CITY – Rep. Tom Gann, R-Inola, on Thursday led a study on the use of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and what he said is their use as a tool for mass surveillance allowing law enforcement to conduct warrantless searches. The study was held before the House Public Safety Committee. Gann looked back at legislation governing the use of ALPRs, which statutorily may only be used to show whether an Oklahoma motorist has automobile insurance. "We were at a crisis level in Oklahoma with the number of uninsured motorists," Gann said, "and the legislation we put in place helped us drastically reduce that number. Now, however, these cameras with the enhanced use of artificial intelligence are monitoring law-abiding citizens in details of their everyday lives. The data is being used well beyond what the law allows." Gann and other study presenters said this infringes on the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."  Gann and others used existing case law to show that vehicles represent property that cannot be searched without warrant. Gann shared several examples of violations by law enforcement in Oklahoma and other states, including a video of a traffic stop on Interstate 35, in which an officer asked the person pulled over about previous visits to the state – using information obtained without a search warrant or probably cause affidavit. "This represents the mass victimization of the American populace. Our rights are being violated every day," Gann said. Other presenters at the study included criminal defense attorney Shena Burgess, who is also an adjunct professor at the University of Tulsa, College of Law. She spoke about Flock cameras, which are prolific in many communities around the state, and how the data from these cameras is being used in violation of Oklahoma law. She said she was first alerted to illegal use when a Tulsa County sheriff's deputy alluded to information obtained from an ALPR that did not involve a search warrant. She's since taken a deep dive into Tulsa Police Department's policies, which state the cameras enhance the department's ability to detect illegal activity and stop crimes. "Statute is clear that law enforcement shall not use this for any reason other than to enforce the compulsory insurance law," Burgess said. "Permitting law enforcement to use this information for any other reason is in violation of statute. We have to have checks and balances to assure police are not abusing their power." Marven Goodman, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who formerly served as a Logan County commissioner and chief information officer for the Oklahoma Military Department and who now works as an investigative journalist, spoke on the use of the cameras by the cities of Guthrie and Edmond. He said he was able to work with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation to eventually get cameras removed from trailers along State Highway 33, and eventually the city of Guthrie dropped its contract with Flock. He said cameras are now monitoring traffic along State Highway 77 in Edmond, and he's again working with ODOT to stop that. He spoke of how data from the cameras can be used with other information to create a mosaic effect, tracking a person's every movement, whether or not they're suspected of criminal activity. He said this constitutes a violation of privacy and civil liberties. Alasdair Whitney, legislative counsel for Institute for Justice, also spoke about ALPRs and the law. He's pursuing a case in Norfolk, VA, filed by citizens who claim they are being tracked relentlessly without warrant in their everyday lives, from their homes to the store to outings with their family and more. He related 41 million images being compiled over 29 days. "We believe this is not law enforcement but mass surveillance and it's unconstitutional," Whitney said. "It begs the question of whether Americans still have the right to move about freely without being watched constantly by the government." He and others agreed Oklahoma law is very clear on paper, but they are concerned with mission creep and insist the law is not being followed. All presenters agreed they are pro-law enforcement and pro-public safety but not at the expense of citizens' constitutional rights. It was suggested at the end of the study that legislation should be filed to detail consequences for agencies found violating the law.