Representative Tom Gann

R

District 8

Hi, I'm Tom Gann and I represent the people of Oklahoma's 8th District.


representative

News & Announcements

Feb 17, 2026
Recent Posts

Final OG&E, PSO Brief Filed with OK Supreme Court

OKLAHOMA CITY – On the fifth anniversary of February 2021’s Winter Storm “Uri,” appeals challenging more than $1.4 billion in bonds and $377 million in rate increases impacting the customers of electric utility companies OG&E and Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) are now in the hands of the Oklahoma Supreme Court.  Tuesday, Reps. Tom Gann, R-Inola, Kevin West, R-Moore, and Rick West, R-Heavener, filed the final brief in their appeal of a 2025 Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) order approving a $127 million rate increase for OG&E without a CPA-led audit of the utility’s 2021 Winter Storm "Uri" bonds. The lawmakers’ OG&E appeal was made a “companion case” with a similar appeal Rep. Gann filed challenging bonds and $250 million in rate increases for PSO, meaning the Court intends to consider the two appeals together. Now that all the briefs have been filed, a decision could come at any time.  “We have asked the court for a lot,” Kevin West said. “We not only asked the justices to overturn the OCC’s rate increases and orders authorizing OG&E and PSO’s 2021 Winter Storm 'Uri' bonds. We have asked the court to require the OCC to follow state ethics rules and to follow state laws that require audits to be conducted by licensed CPAs.” Another brief the representatives filed on Dec. 18, 2025, in a related appeal alleged the OCC had allowed an employee believed to have dropped out of college as a sophomore to perform required audits of utility companies collectively worth more than a billion dollars, including in the challenged OG&E and PSO rate cases.  “The OCC’s past violations of the law have far-reaching consequences, especially since they are ongoing, impacting current cases,” said Gann, who has seven more OCC utility case appeals pending at the Supreme Court, challenging some $11 billion in utility charges by ONG, OG&E and PSO. All were approved by the OCC with votes by embattled OCC Commissioner Todd Hiett. Gann, West and West’s appeals accuse the OCC of violating ratepayers’ due process rights by permitting Commissioner Hiett to participate. OG&E and PSO were represented in these cases by attorneys who hosted a 2023 party where Hiett allegedly sexually harassed two female OCC employees and drove home drunk. The lawmakers argue that state ethics rules prohibit Hiett from participating in OCC cases involving victims/witnesses of his alleged criminal conduct. Although the Ethics Commission dismissed a complaint against Hiett in May 2025, the representatives’ appeal asks the Supreme Court to review its interpretation of the law. Attorney General Gentner Drummond, who statutorily represents ratepayers in utility cases before the OCC and Supreme Court, defended Hiett’s participation in a brief the AG filed on January 27, 2026. “Parties to legislative rate cases are not entitled to due process,” the attorney general wrote [on page 31]. An earlier motion by the attorney general to dismiss the lawmakers’ OG&E and PSO rate case appeals was denied by the Supreme Court. “The court could choose to address all the OCC’s violations of law in these first two appeals, or just some or none,” Gann said. “The more issues it tackles now, the longer it will probably take to get a decision. But the clearer the court is in its first decision about which laws the OCC is required to follow, the fewer appeals it will ultimately have to decide.” Oklahoma utilities PSO, OG&E, ONG and CenterPoint/Summit paid some of the highest natural gas prices in U.S. history during the two-week “Uri” cold snap in February 2021, incurring some $2.8 billion in debt. Interest and other expenses added another $2 billion, bringing the total cost of the winter storm bonds being paid by Oklahoma utility customers close to $5 billion.  Payments for OG&E and PSO’s bonds have been collected as “Winter Event Securitization” and “Winter Storm Cost Recovery” charges on the monthly bills of their customers since the bonds were issued in 2022. Those bond payments are scheduled to continue for another two decades and are required to be audited as part of the utilities’ rate cases. The representatives say that hasn’t happened. The lawmakers’ “reply” brief filed Tuesday addresses arguments made by OG&E, the OCC and the attorney general in defense of the challenged rate increase order and winter storm bonds. All three defense briefs argue that the OCC’s Public Utility Division audits do not have to be performed by licensed CPAs. “This Court should reject Appellants’ [Gann, West and West’s] contention that all rate-case audits must comply with the Oklahoma Accountancy Act and uphold the [OCC’s] Final Order as proper,” the attorney general wrote in his January 27 brief [page 19]. “Imagine the consequences of that,” said Rick West. “Imagine the financial chaos that would break out across state government if the court says it’s okay for state agencies to make up their own definition of “audit” and allow any staffer to do them, the way the OCC did. The Department of Mental Health would be a drop in the bucket compared to what would happen next.” The lawmakers are optimistic about their appeals, believing both the law and the facts are overwhelmingly on their side. “This matter is urgent,” the representatives’ brief tells the court.  “Having already paid hundreds of millions of dollars of these illegitimate charges, these utilities’ captive customers have suffered enough.” Reps. Gann, West and West’s newest “reply” brief can be read online here: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetDocument.aspx?ct=appellate&bc=1064376140&cn=CU-123021&fmt=pdf The progress of all the appeals can be followed on the Oklahoma Supreme Court website: PSO rate case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122861 OG&E rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123021 ONG, PSO & OG&E CY2023 fuel cases: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122991 ONG rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123348 ONG CY2024 fuel case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123588 OG&E CY2024 fuel case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123608

Jan 15, 2026
Recent Posts

Gann Announces ‘Open Legislature Initiative’ to Subject Lawmakers to Transparency Laws

OKLAHOMA CITY – Rep. Tom Gann, R-Inola, on Thursday announced a comprehensive transparency package aimed at bringing the Oklahoma Legislature under the state’s open meetings and open records standards, calling the move "necessary to restore public trust and end a culture of secrecy in state government." House Bill 3842 , which Gann is calling the Open Legislature Initiative, is formally titled the Legislative Transparency, Accountability, and Open Meetings Act of 2026 . In addition to requiring continued public notice and recording of legislative meetings for the Oklahoma House of the state Senate, the measure would mandate disclosure of lobbyist influence tied to legislation and prohibit nondisclosure agreements that interfere with lawmakers’ official duties. “The Legislature cannot demand transparency from every other public body while exempting itself,” Gann said. “If we expect open government, we must lead by example.” Gann said recent events have highlighted the need for reform. He pointed to criticism surrounding the Legislative Compensation Board, which met in executive session before approving pay raises, as well as growing efforts by other government bodies to secure exemptions from open-meeting requirements. The Oklahoma Corporation Commission has received an exemption for some discussions, and county commissioners in multiple counties have sought similar treatment, he said. “When the Legislature operates outside transparency laws, it incentivizes others to do the same,” Gann said. “That is how secrecy spreads through government.” Under Gann's proposal, the Legislature and all committees, conference committees, task forces and working groups would be required to: ·      provide advance public notice and agendas; ·      allow public observation and recording of meetings; ·      post meeting records online within seven days; and ·      refrain from taking votes outside Open Meeting Act compliance. Under the bill, any legislative action taken in violation of the act would be invalid. The measure also would require lawmakers to file a Lobbyist Impact Statement if they have received campaign contributions, gifts or other benefits from lobbyists connected to legislation they sponsor. Failure to file the Lobbyist Impact Statement would constitute an ethics violation and carry criminal penalties. Lawmakers are currently required to submit campaign finance and financial disclosures to the Oklahoma Ethics Commission. Additionally, the bill would mandate that legislators disclose any nondisclosure agreements they sign, and any agreement restricting communication with constituents or legislative deliberation would be void. “Open meetings and open records are the ethical foundation of representative government,” Gann said. “Secrecy erodes trust, and trust is essential to a functioning republic.” Gann noted that a separate resolution, HR 1001 , is still eligible for consideration. That proposal would further guarantee additional recorded votes on legislation and prevent bills from being blocked without public accountability. “Oklahomans deserve to know who voted, who blocked a vote and why,” Gann said. If enacted, the Legislative Transparency, Accountability, and Open Meetings Act of 2026 would take effect July 1, 2026. It will be eligible for consideration in the Second Regular Session of the 60th Legislature, which convenes Feb. 2.

Dec 19, 2025
Recent Posts

Reps. Contend OCC Let College Dropout Perform Utility Audits, Challenge Another $1.5B of Customer Charges with Supreme Court

OKLAHOMA CITY – An employee of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) who is believed to have dropped out of college as a sophomore has been performing audits of utility companies collectively worth more than a billion dollars, a brief filed Thursday at the Oklahoma Supreme Court reveals. Reps. Tom Gann, R-Inola, Kevin West, R-Moore, and Rick West, R-Heavener, are challenging OCC orders approving some $1.5 billion of 2023 fuel and purchased power costs incurred by monopoly public utilities ONG, OG&E and PSO. Their brief asks the Court to overturn the OCC’s approval orders and require new, lawful fuel audits and prudence reviews by outside, independent auditors and experts, instead of the OCC’s Public Utility Division (PUD) staff. “Fuel adjustment clause charges are passed through directly onto customers’ bills, so the utilities have already collected this money from us,” said Gann, a customer of ONG, OG&E and PSO. “State law requires audits of the utilities’ fuel charges every year. It also requires the OCC to make sure those costs were fair, just, reasonable and prudent before approving them. These laws exist to protect ratepayers, but the OCC doesn’t seem to care whether the people conducting these audits and prudence reviews are qualified or not.”  The representatives’ brief includes an email from the University of Central Oklahoma confirming that the OCC PUD staff member in question does not have a degree from the university and has not been enrolled since 2015. A resume attached to his testimony shows he has been employed by the OCC PUD since 2019 and served as the OCC’s lead analyst in 2022 and 2023 fuel cases for PSO. At that staff member’s recommendation, the OCC approved more than $1.2 billion of PSO’s fuel costs passed through to customers in those cases.  The brief shows the staffer also testified in recent rate cases for PSO and OG&E that resulted in almost $400 million in rate increases for customers. The representatives filed briefs at the court challenging those OCC-approved orders in August and November. All were approved by the OCC with votes by embattled OCC Commissioner Todd Hiett. Gann, Kevin West and Rick West’s newest brief accuses the OCC of violating state laws about audits and prudence reviews, and of violating ratepayers’ due process rights by permitting Commissioner Hiett to participate. ONG, OG&E and PSO were represented in these cases by attorneys who hosted a 2023 party where Hiett allegedly sexually harassed two female OCC employees and drove home drunk. ONG also was represented by an attorney whom the brief describes as “an outcry witness” to Hiett’s alleged sexual assault of a ONE Gas employee at a 2024 conference in Minnesota. The representatives argue that State Ethics Rules and the Code of Judicial Conduct prohibit Hiett from participating in OCC cases involving victims/witnesses of his alleged criminal conduct.  Thursday’s brief says the OCC’s disregard for the law has shielded more than $10 billion of utility fuel charges from lawful, required audits and prudence reviews since 2021. OG&E, PSO and ONG paid some of the highest natural gas prices in U.S. history during a two-week cold snap in February 2021, incurring some $2.8 billion in fuel costs during the storm and another $1.8 billion for the rest of the year. The representatives already have challenged more than $1.4 billion in 2021 Winter Storm bonds for OG&E and PSO authorized by the OCC, with an appeal of ONG’s $1.3 billion in bonds pending. Thursday’s brief says they also plan to challenge the OCC’s fuel approval orders for 2021 and 2022 in their appeals of the agency’s 2024 fuel approval orders, two of which were filed the first week in December.  “Not everyone has to graduate from college,” Rick West said. “But state employees being paid with taxpayer dollars have to be qualified for the jobs they’re hired for. This situation is not only an assault on the household budgets of utility customers; it is an insult to thousands of qualified public servants who are legitimately earning their paychecks.” The representatives’ last appeal brief, filed just before Thanksgiving, said OG&E “unduly (and possibly unlawfully) influenced” the hiring of the OCC’s financial advisor in the Winter Storm bond cases, Hilltop Securities. It also questioned how OG&E and PSO’s lender, RBC Capital, was hired to underwrite both utilities’ bond deals, when RBC’s bid was 25% higher than JP Morgan’s. (Hilltop Securities advised the Oklahoma Development Finance Authority on the bond underwriters’ bidding process.) The most recent brief describes “accounting shell games” and $100 million of OG&E’s 2021 fuel costs that remain unaccounted for.  “There are serious concerns about how the Corporation Commission is operating,” Kevin West said. “We have asked the Supreme Court to intervene regarding flawed audits and due process issues, but its role is necessarily limited.” In September, the OCC’s director of administration told House members that recent challenges stemmed from staffing shortages. “In order to protect ratepayers and maintain public confidence and transparency, the Legislature will have to step in and ensure proper procedures are being followed,” Kevin West said. All told, Gann, Kevin West and Rick West’s filed and pending appeals challenge more than $11 billion in utility charges for ONG, OG&E and PSO. The full Brief in Chief for the combined 2023 fuel cases appeal can be read online here: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetDocument.aspx?ct=appellate&bc=1063627122&cn=CU-122991&fmt=pdf ONG, OG&E, PSO, the OCC and the Attorney General’s Office have 40 days to respond. The progress of all the appeals can be followed on the Oklahoma Supreme Court website: PSO rate case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122861 OG&E rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123021 ONG, PSO & OG&E CY2023 fuel cases: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=122991 ONG rate case: https://oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123348 ONG CY2024 fuel case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123588 OG&E CY2024 fuel case: https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?db=appellate&number=123608